Being extracts, the information shown here are mainly to give you an idea of what information can be found in the court records in the 1700s rural Denmark. To get the most out of your research effort it is best to know precise who or what you are looking for.
Tips!These judicial resources are mostly used by experienced family historian or professional genealogist who knows their way around the archive and with a good knowledge of the Danish language and transcription of old documents etc.
The court records ("TingbĂ¸ger") contain the land registry as well as reports of civil and criminal actions. The records generally require a lot time to study as only a few has not been transcribed, indexed or translated and next to nothing is available online. However, court records can be excellent sources to your family history as you may find names, dates, places, and relationships in these records. At times, especially in cases of inheritance, you may even find the names and relations of entire families. These records must, however, only be used as an addition to the basic genealogical records found in parish registers and census list and perhaps in conjunction with other records such as mortgage records, probate records etc.
May 21, 1726: Dragoon Jens Michelsen from Vork vs. Johanne Jensdatter, ibidem. She had mentioned him as the alleged father of her child. Jens Michelsen had sworn never to have had any physical relation with her except for one single incident, namely July 9, 1725, while cutting grass for the horses on RĂ¸j Field. Today she swears that he is the father of her child, and that she haven't had any relations with other. Witnesses called.
May 28, 1726: Peder SĂ¸rensen and Peder Pedersen from Billund brought along four living wolf cubs, which they had caught on they field. The cubs were hung in the prescribed wolf gallows and the men received their reward.
September 24, 1726: Prosecutor vs. Jep JĂ¸rgensen from Ă…gĂĄrd. Case postponed until Oct. 22 (but not seen again later). On Sept. 13 Peder Henriksen and Jens Nielsen from Ă…gĂĄrd had been on a visit to Jep JĂ¸rgensen together with Anders Eliasen, the assistant to the County Prefect. Anders Eliasen asked Jep JĂ¸rgensen to serve him brandy ("brĂ¦ndevin"). As soon as the brandy was served, Anders Eliasen began searching the house for distilling equipment. The equipment he found where sealed and placed in Jep JĂ¸rgensen's living room where they could be kept untouched. The witnesses had not tasted the liquid in the distilling kettle, and could not say for certain if is was brandy or not.
October 29, 1726: Sentence: the parish vicar JĂ¸rgen Cronius from Vorbasse vs. (Hans Pedersen and Peder Poulsen as well as ) Samuel Eliasen Biener from Vestervig in Vorbasse Parish for tithe. Biener has not paid any tithe of his produce since he moved to Vestervig, and states that the statutory order of April 26, 1723 excludes him from paying being a colonist of an inhabited and desolate place on the heath; he wants, opposite the two other accused who has reached settlement with the vicar, to be acquitted. However, the statutory order only grants freedom from taxes and other contributions to the King and not from paying tithe to the vicar. Therefore Samuel Eliasen Biener should pay the vicar tithe of all crops he has grown since moving to Vestervig based on a fair estimate that both can agree on.
November 19, 1726: Poul Hansen from Seest vs. his father Hans Hansen the older, ibidem. Settlement agreement. The case is about 13 years of interest of an amount of 100 â€śrigsdalerâ€ť, which were inherited by Hans Bertelsen, the step son of Poul Hansen, after the death of his mother. As a part of the agreement Poul Hansen now states that he is satisfied with the payment from his father and Hans Hansen states that Poul Hansen has raised his son properly. Other accusations between each other during the court proceedings are withdrawn.
November 26, 1726: Statutory order of Nov. 8 were read out loud specifying that anyone who buys or sells a church should report the trade to Chancellery ['Danske Kancelli'] and the local Bishop within a month from the bill of sale.
December 10, 1726: Jens Rasmussen Viborg from Nyborg has summoned his wife Kirsten Albertsdatter from Borlev in order to call witnesses that his wife has denied him his marital right. The couple were married 12 years ago. Witnesses called [?].
December 17, 1726: Jens SĂ¸rensen from Egum [lod lĂ¸se obligation af] Hans Hansen from Egeskov, who has the intention to take over SĂ¸ren Nielsen's farm in Engum on the condition that he marries SĂ¸ren Nielsen's daughter Maren SĂ¸rensdatter. Jens SĂ¸rensen, who is her brother, will receive 70 â€śslettedalerâ€ť, which is his full dowry.
March 11, 1727: Lauge Hansen from Stovstrup vs. Birthe Christensdatter from ErritsĂ¸ for defamation. Settlement agreement.
March 18, 1727: Prosecutor vs. the arrestee Oluf Ebbesen from HĂĄstrup. Sentence by the judge ("birkedommeren") and a jury of his peers; Mogens Rasmussen and Jens Andersen from Viuf, Hans Simonsen from Lilballe, Mads Bek from Eltang, Jacob Pedersen Haar and SĂ¸ren Kyed from Starup, Hans Hansen Bull from Eltang and Jens Simonsen from Dons: It has been proven that Oluf Ebbesen Bels has lived in an incompatible marriage with his late wife Else Poulsdatter. She was seen hale and hearty in the evening of Jan. 23, where she by the morning of Jan. 24 were found dead in her bed. Witnesses had heard her scream during the night, the last time as if she couldn't scream as loud. From the investigation on the scene of crime there were evidence indicating that she might have been strangulated with a piece of rope. Oluf Ebbesen were immediately arrested and during the questioning he came up with some rather unbelievable explanations until he Feb. 2 at Koldinghus admitted having strangled his wife with an old rag or scarf she had carried round her neck. When she was dead Oluf had placed her on her bed still in her clothes and wiped the blood of her face before he went outside.
Oluf Ebbesen Bels should as a foul murderer be punished in accordance with the law of Oct. 16, 1697. On the execution day he should firstly be pinched with red-hot pincers by the executioner outside the house where the crime was committed, since three times underway between the house and the place of execution, and again one last time at the place of execution. Next his right hand should be hacked off followed by his beheading, both by axe. Next the executioner's assistants should place the body on a wheel and mount the head and hand on a spike. The executioner will receive payment according the tariff.
Karen Nielsdatter, a servant girl at Oluf Ebbesen, had heard screams during the night and again early in the morning. In the morning Oluf Ebbesen left the house, lighted up his pipe and asked Karen's daughter to make the wagon and horses ready for draught so they all could get started working in the woods, and that she could get Else to help her. When the daughter entered the bedroom, she found Else lying on the bed. Karen and her daughter hasted to Oluf Ebbesen in the woods with the message that Else either had fainted or was dead. "If so, I am very misfortuned", Oluf said. "I've lost my sow, my horse, and now also my wife!". Oluf then ordered Karen to get hold of some women from the village in order to place Else on a bed of straw, but Karen had refused. Karen estimated Else to be about 80 years old.
May 27, 1727: Corporal SĂ¸ren Knudsen from Kolding has summoned the parish vicar JĂ¸rgen FĂ¦dder from Gauerslund and Maren Nielsdatter from BrĂ¸ndsted (or Brejning) regarding that the young woman had promised him marriage. He had sent dispatches to the vicar forbidding that the young woman should marries any other than him. However, Maren's legal guardian, Rasmus Pedesen MĂ¸ller from Pjedsted, states that the corporal never have announced his intentions of marriage to him as Maren's legal guardian nor to her mother or step father, and she has now been betrothal to Jens Pedersen, who's farm will suffer [?] should the marriage be postponed.